CQI V5.0

Compounding Quality Index — Moat Ranking

39 Companies | 6 Industries | 14 Dimensions | 42 Sub-factors

Rating Date: March 2026 | Data Window: 2014-2025 (11 years)

v5.0: Dual-dimension trend refinement (structural widening vs execution gain) + trend driver annotations

Full Ranking

#CompanyTickerCQITrendTrend DriverReportComment
1CopartCPRT
82
Execution gainADAS total loss rate ↑ + international expansionReadTwo-sided auction network + irreplicable land bank — the only counter-cyclical monopolist
2S&P GlobalSPGI
74
StableInstitutional lock-in solid, no change signalsReadBasel III-locked rating duopoly, pricing power still largely untapped
3FICOFICO
72
Active erosionFHFA approved VantageScore, opening institutional crackSoonInstitutional monopoly pricing being unlocked, but the institution itself is being opened
4Moody'sMCO
70
StableRating institution shows no looseningSoonRating duopoly, MIS is a 60%+ OPM cash machine — MA growth is the key variable
5MicrosoftMSFT
67
StableOffice/Azure lock-in solid, AI investment offsetsReadEnterprise OS monopoly, but AI arms race is eating into margins
6AlphabetGOOGL
66
Execution gainGemini rolling out across all product linesReadKnowledge gateway tollbooth — Gemini ecosystem rollout is widening the AI moat
7ASMLASML
59
StableEUV exclusive position unchangedReadThe only lithography maker — humanity's most precise bottleneck
8CostcoCOST
59
Execution gainMember base still growing, 93% renewal rate holdingReadIntentionally earns nothing on goods — 93% membership renewal and still growing
9MetaMETA
58
StableAd targeting advantage solid, AI investment offsetsRead3.9B user behavioral database — unmatched ad targeting precision
10AmazonAMZN
56
Execution gainAWS + logistics + advertising triple flywheel acceleratingReadUnmatched three-engine flywheel, but $200B CapEx is a faith test
11IDEXXIDXX
56
StableConsumable lock-in model unchangedSoonInstall the analyzer, lock in the consumables — a vet diagnostics razor-blade model
12AppleAAPL
55
Structural erosionGlobal antitrust dismantling walled garden (DMA/DOJ)ReadDeepest consumer ecosystem, but regulators are dismantling the walled garden
13VisaV
53
Structural erosionFedNow/UPI real-time payments eroding + fee regulationSoonWorld's largest payment network, but fee regulation + real-time payments rising
14KLA CorpKLAC
52
Structural wideningAdvanced node physics → inspection density irreversibly risingReadInvisible yield gatekeeper — the smaller the chip, the more essential KLA becomes
15CintasCTAS
51
StableDensity + cross-sell model stableSoonUniforms + mats + first aid — each added layer doubles the lock-in
16Arm HoldingsARM
49
Active erosionRISC-V penetrating market by market (IoT→auto→server)ReadAn invisible semiconductor tax, but RISC-V is eroding it market by market
17NVIDIANVDA
48
StableCUDA deepening vs custom silicon threat, two forces offsettingReadCUDA ecosystem deepening short-term, but custom silicon is a long-term threat
18ICEICE
47
StableExchange network effects solidSoonLiquidity network effects + NYSE brand, but leverage + cyclicality drag compounding
19P&GPG
47
Structural erosionPrivate label penetration structurally risingRead69 consecutive years of dividend increases, but private label penetration keeps rising
20EatonETN
46
Structural wideningElectrification + DC power = decade-long structural demandReadPicks-and-shovels play for electrification — data center power demand is exploding
21TSMCTSM
45
StableTech lead widening vs geopolitical risk unchanged, offsettingReadTech lead widening, but geopolitical risk persists — two forces offsetting
22BroadcomAVGO
44
StableAI ASIC growth vs M&A integration riskSoonKing of acquisitions, but stock-based comp is quietly diluting shareholders
23Lam ResearchLRCX
43
Structural erosionEtch share slowly eroding (TEL/AMAT encroaching)ReadOne of the etch big three — market share slowly slipping, a boiling frog
24AristaANET
42
Structural wideningAI backend networking = new category structural demandReadAI backend networking demand deepening moat, but extreme customer concentration
25CoStarCSGP
41
StableCRE data monopoly solidSoonCRE data monopoly at 47% OPM, but the Homes.com bet is consuming everything
26Applied MaterialsAMAT
41
StablePortfolio breadth stable but no pricing power improvementReadWidest equipment portfolio, but breadth doesn't equal pricing power
27PalantirPLTR
39
Execution gainAIP expanding Ontology customer coverageReadOntology lock-in deepening via AIP, but SBC and valuation are two deep moats to cross
28Domino'sDPZ
36
StableDelivery network density unchangedReadLargest pizza delivery network — value positioning limits pricing power
29ChipotleCMG
35
StableOperational efficiency stable but no lock-inReadFastest burrito assembly line, but zero customer lock-in
30StarbucksSBUX
33
Active erosionLuckin in China + OPM collapse + brand premium damagedReadLuckin competition in China + OPM collapsing to single digits + brand premium eroding
31VertivVRT
30
Execution gainNVIDIA partnership deepening liquid cooling first-mover edgeReadNVIDIA partnership deepening liquid cooling first-mover edge, but each platform gen reshuffles
32RollinsROL
30
StableRoute density economics unchangedSoonPest control density economics — but eleven years of zero profit growth
33FastenalFAST
25
StableChannel lock-in stable but no pricing powerSoonQuality without flair — locks in the channel, not the price
34MarriottMAR
21
StableBrand portfolio stableReadMost hotel brands, but overshadowed by Hilton's growth velocity
35HiltonHLT
21
Execution gainHighest NUG in industry + Honors ecosystem expandingReadHighest NUG in hospitality, but one point of NUG decline changes valuation 7x
36Royal CaribbeanRCL
16
Execution gainPrivate destination expansion + record OPMReadPrivate destination expansion + record OPM, but built on top of the cycle
37IntelINTC
14
Full collapseCPU/GPU/foundry share declining across multiple linesReadCHIPS Act as a bankruptcy backstop, but losing share across multiple markets simultaneously
38IHGIHG
11
StableFranchise model solid but cycle-sensitiveSoonTrue margins hidden by reporting structure — cyclicality is the Achilles' heel
39Super MicroSMCI
8
Active erosionGross margin declining from 18% to 6%ReadGross margin declining from 18% to 6% — assembler fate caps the profit ceiling

Key Findings

Three of the top four are institutionally embedded — CPRT (quasi-regulated insurance salvage), SPGI and FICO (regulators mandate their products). Even if the product isn't the best, regulation and industry convention force adoption. Competitors aren't beaten by technology — they're excluded by the system.

Methodology

The Compounding Quality Index (CQI) evaluates long-term compounding quality across 6 dimensions, scoring up to 100 with 42 quantitative sub-factors over an 11-year data window (2014-2025).

DimensionAssessmentCore Question
Pricing PowerCan it raise prices above inflation without losing customers?How many customers leave if prices rise 10%?
Customer StickinessDepth of customer lock-in x revenue recurrenceHow much time and money does it cost to switch?
MoatInstitutional embedding + network effects + ecosystem lock-inHow many years would a competitor need to catch up?
Growth RunwayRevenue engine clarity x remaining TAMHow many times can revenue multiply in 10 years?
Capital DisciplineMargin elasticity + capital allocation efficiencyIs the cash being deployed wisely?
Competitive BarriersData flywheel + economies of scale + physical barriersHow much would it cost a new entrant to replicate?

Trend Legend

Structural wideningIndustry structure/physics irreversibly deepening moatManagement-independent
Execution gainCompany actively deepening moat via share/ecosystem/productExecution-dependent
StableMoat is solid with no material change
Structural erosionRegulation/substitutes/competition structurally eroding moatHard to reverse
Active erosionSpecific competitors/substitutes actively breaching moatClear threat identified
Full collapseMoat evaporating across multiple frontsMultiple factors compounding

Disclaimer: The Compounding Quality Index (CQI) is a research tool based on public data, evaluating business model quality rather than stock price direction. High CQI does not equal a buy recommendation, and low CQI does not equal a sell recommendation. Investment decisions should consider valuation, macro conditions, and other factors not covered by this index.

Moat Ranking — Compounding Quality Index CQI | 100baggers.club | 100Baggers.club